Consent Decrees and Settlement Law

Legislation by Lawsuit: How America’s election rules keep changing without a single vote being cast.

In theory, lawmaking belongs to legislatures.

In practice, the new bills are written by plaintiffs, defendants, and judges in sealed conference rooms.

The modern election cycle runs on consent decrees—agreements presented as “settlements,” but functionally amendments to state law.

It’s democracy by stipulation, and it happens in plain sight.

I. The Legal Shortcut That Became a Policy Machine

A consent decree is supposed to end litigation: both sides agree to terms, a judge signs, and everyone goes home.

But when the defendant is a state election official, those terms rewrite procedures statewide.

Deadlines shift, verification standards soften, and mail-ballot rules flex—all without legislative debate.

Once entered, decrees can last years, binding successors who never signed them.

Example:

Georgia 2021 – 2023: the Raffensperger–Elias signature-match decree became the default rule for absentee ballots.
Pennsylvania 2022: date-error “cure” decrees converted technical rejections into acceptances.
North Carolina 2024: settlement extended provisional-ballot counting beyond statute.

The result is a shadow codebook enforced by courts instead of chambers.

II. The Pipeline: Sue → Settle → Cite

1️⃣ Litigation Frontload — Elias Law Group or partner NGOs file early.

2️⃣ Negotiated Terms — Secretaries of State “settle” to avoid trial risk.

3️⃣ Judicial Blessing — Judge signs, converts into binding order.

4️⃣ Future Citations — Other states cite it as precedent for “modernization.”

It’s process judo: use one state’s retreat as another’s weapon.

III. Why Legislatures Lose

Lawmakers rarely intervene; counsel costs money.
Courts treat decrees as contracts, not laws—so separation-of-powers objections fail.
Once approved, reversal requires a new lawsuit, not a vote.
Media coverage calls it “compromise,” masking the structural power shift.

The legislature writes the first draft; the courtroom edits the final one.

IV. The Numbers Game

According to Election Law Blog tracking, since 2020 more than 140 election-related consent decrees have altered rules in 27 states.

Roughly 70 percent originated from progressive plaintiffs.

Duration averages three election cycles.

The longer they persist, the more agencies treat them as settled law rather than temporary accommodation.

V. How to Reclaim Rulemaking

Statutory sunset clauses — no decree survives beyond one election.
Mandatory legislative ratification for procedural settlements.
Public posting within 48 hours of filing.
Independent counsel representing legislative interests in every election case.
Automatic review after each cycle to purge outdated orders.

Reform isn’t rocket science—it’s paperwork with daylight.

VI. The Bottom Line

The courtroom has become the new committee room.

When litigation replaces legislation, voters lose visibility and lawmakers lose authority.

Every “consent decree” sold as compromise is really a contract — binding the governed without their consent.

Citations